Examining Sexual Health Organizational Networks in Urban African American Communities Using Social Network Theory.

PURPOSE: Collaboration among organizations offering sexual health and youth development services has the potential to provide youth with effective sexual health support. However, formally structured efforts (eg, coalition formation) may be impractical or unsuitable for low-income communities where resources are often already limited. Social network theories provide an alternative approach for building collaborative organizational networks. APPROACH: Research aims to evaluate the barriers and facilitators to collaboration in sexual health organizational networks. SETTING: Organizations in low income, urban, communities in Chicago and San Francisco that serve African American adolescents. PARTICIPANTS: Providers (n = 22) from organizations that offer sexual health services and youth development services. METHODS: Focus groups (n = 4) were conducted and analyzed utilizing a combination of coding strategies. RESULTS: Barriers to collaboration included resource limitations and competition, differences in organizational roles and deliverables, and prejudice and stigma. Identifying common ground among organizations was found to be a facilitator to collaboration. Social network concepts in conjunction with study findings lead to the development of a practice model that hypothesizes a pathway for organizations to improve collaboration without formally structured efforts. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer ways to encourage collaboration among organizations that support youth sexual health in low-income, urban, African American communities without relying on formal structures. Such collaborations may be critical for improving the provision of comprehensive sexual health support.

Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies.

A husbandry advisory tool (HAT) was devised to help pig producers and their advisors identify and minimise possible risk factors for tail biting in finishing pigs. The prevalence of 83 risk factors identified from the literature and expert opinion was recorded on 65 commercial pig farms in England between May 2007 and July 2009. Those considered most important were associated with atmosphere/environment, environmental enrichment, the provision of food/drink and animal health factors. Forty-six farms received advice on minimising these risks and, of these, 27 also received a financial incentive to encourage the uptake of advice. A reduction in risk factors was observed on 42/57 farms visited at the end of the study, with the greatest reduction occurring on the farms that had been incentivised. However, farms not receiving advice also had reduced risk factors associated with atmosphere/environment and stocking density over the course of the study. In conclusion, while some risk factors are structural and require substantial capital investment to change, a significant reduction in the risk of tail biting can be achieved on many farms through the systematic evaluation and modification of management practices.

Tail-biting: a new perspective.

Tail-biting data from different studies are difficult to compare because a range of definitions of tail-biting behaviour and tail-biting lesions are used. Although records from abattoirs provide a large database, their usefulness is restricted as tail-biting is under-recorded and environmental and husbandry factors associated with the behaviour are unlikely to be known. Both farm and abattoir data provide no information on the number of pigs biting, only those bitten. Studying individual animals that tail-bite should give a better understanding of the pig's motivation to tail-bite and which of the components of its environment should be adjusted to improve welfare. This review examines the existing literature on tail-biting in pigs but considered from a new perspective using three different descriptive behavioural types, namely, 'two-stage', 'sudden-forceful' and 'obsessive', each of which may have different motivational bases. The article also considers the different environmental and husbandry factors which may affect each type of behaviour and discusses why this is such a complicated field and why it is often difficult to draw conclusions from available research.

Measuring and modelling the photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus).

The photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken was determined using an operant conditioning psychophysical technique. The results show both high- and low-frequency fall-off in the sensitivity response, which peaked around 15 Hz. Flicker sensitivity was determined for a range of stimulus luminance levels, and directly compared to human flicker response measured under similar stimulus conditions. At five luminance levels (10, 100, 200, 500 and 1000 cd/m(2)), the overall chicken flicker sensitivity was found to be considerably lower than for humans, except at high frequencies. A greater degree of frequency tuning was also found in the chicken response. The critical flicker fusion values were either similar or slightly higher for chickens compared to humans (40.8, 50.4, 53.3, 58.2 and 57.4 Hz vs 39.2, 54.0, 54.0, 57.4 and 71.5 Hz respectively for humans and chickens for increasing stimulus luminance level). A recently proposed model for flicker sensitivity [Vision Research 39 (1999) 533], which incorporates low- and high-pass temporal filters in cascade, was found to be applicable to the chicken response. From this model, deductions were made concerning mechanisms controlling the transfer of temporal information.